Barmen Declaration and Political Theology: What Does the Church Owe the State?

Rev. C•D•F• Warrington, M.Div.
By Rev. C•D•F• Warrington, M.Div.

Ordained Minister, M.Div.

April 25, 2026

Barmen Declaration addressing the church's relationship to political authority

The Barmen Declaration is often read as purely a church-internal document — a confession about who the church's Lord is. But Thesis 5 steps deliberately into political territory, offering a compressed but powerful account of what the church owes the state and what the state may not demand of the church.

The State's Legitimate Role

Thesis 5 begins positively. Scripture tells us the state has a God-given task: providing for justice and peace through the threat and exercise of force, according to human judgment and ability. This is classic Reformation political theology, drawing on Romans 13 and 1 Peter 2. The church is not anarchist — it acknowledges the state's legitimate authority and gives thanks for it.

The Double Rejection

But Thesis 5 contains two rejections, not one. The first rejects the state becoming totalitarian — claiming the right to order all of human life, including the church's mission. The second is less often noticed: it rejects the church becoming an organ of the state. Both errors are rejected symmetrically. The church must not be statist; the state must not be ecclesiastical.

A Framework for Today

This double rejection gives the Barmen framework unusual durability. It resists both the right-wing error (state captures church) and the left-wing error (church becomes political movement). In every era when churches face pressure — whether from authoritarian governments or from cultural movements demanding ideological conformity — Thesis 5 provides a principled response: the state has its lane, the church has its lane, and Christ rules over both.

Barmen and the Two-Kingdoms Tradition

Barmen's political theology shares family resemblance with Luther's two-kingdoms doctrine, but it is not identical. Barth was suspicious of two-kingdoms thinking, fearing it could create a secular realm beyond Christ's lordship — precisely the error Thesis 2 rejects. For Barth, Christ is Lord over everything, including politics. The state's authority is real, but it is not autonomous: it operates under God's rule, and the church's job is to remind it of that. For the Barmen theses examined for their continuing relevance, the Warfield Lectures remain the standard scholarly treatment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Barmen say about the relationship between church and state?

Thesis 5 affirms the state's God-given role in justice and peace, while rejecting both totalitarianism (state absorbing the church) and ecclesiasticism (church becoming an organ of the state).

Is the Barmen Declaration relevant to politics today?

Yes. Its framework — that the state has a legitimate but limited role, and that the church's primary loyalty is to Christ, not any political agenda — applies wherever churches face pressure to align themselves with ideological movements.

Related Articles